| Product ID | MASK-H-005 |
| Key Benefits | Repair + Hydration |
| Target Audience | women&men skincare |
| Package | 1 pack*0.88fl.oz./25mL*5pcs |
| Shelf life | 3 years |
| MOQ | 50kg |
| Delivery Time | 40-60 days(Once the design draft is finalized) |
Aqua, Butylene Glycol, Pentylene Glycol, Hydroxyacetophenone, Hexylene Glycol, Panthenol, Sodium Hyaluronate, Collagen, Arginine, Trehalose, Carbomer, Allantoin, Centella Asiatica Flower/Leaf/Stem Extract, Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate, Hydroxyethylcellulose, Glutathione, Disodium Hydrogen Phosphate, Polysorbate 60, Sodium Dihydrogen Phosphate
Post-aesthetic procedure; Post-sunburn; Seasonal sensitivity; Compromised skin barrier; Those needing urgent repair
Test Protocol: This study involved 30 healthy Asian (Chinese) male and female subjects. The number of valid subjects was 30 (100% validity rate). By measuring various parameters before and after the use of the test sample, the product’s claimed repairing efficacy was verified.
| Skin transepidermal water loss (TEWL) value | |
| 2 hours after using the sample | For the 30 subjects, the rate of change in transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in the test area was -26.09%, while that in the control area was -23.03%; a significant difference was observed between the two groups. |
|---|---|
| 4 hours after using the sample | Among the 30 subjects, the rate of change in transepidermal water loss (TEWL) for the skin in the test area was -34.16%, while that for the control area was -24.34%; a significant difference was observed between the two groups. |
| conclusion | The results indicate that the test samples exhibit repair efficacy after 2 and 4 hours of use. |
| Skin Hemoglobin EI Value | |
| 2 hours after using the sample | The rate of change in the skin hemoglobin EI value in the test area for the 30 subjects was -22.88%, while that in the control area was -12.26%; there was no significant difference between the two groups. |
| 4 hours after using the sample | The rate of change in the skin hemoglobin EI value in the test area for the 30 subjects was -25.09%, while that in the control area was -16.09%; there was no significant difference between the two sets of data. |
Criteria for determining the validity of the test parameters: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0. The test data were subjected to a normality test; a t-test was used for normally distributed data, while a rank-sum test was used for non-normally distributed data. The significance level was set at p < 0.05, with statistical significance defined within a 95% confidence interval.
Regarding the correlation between the test parameters and the efficacy claim: “Repair” implies helping to maintain the treated area in a normal state; therefore, the repair efficacy of the sample can be evaluated by measuring improvements in Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL), stratum corneum water content, or the hemoglobin Erythema Index (EI) value before and after product application.
Measurement of stratum corneum water content is based on the internationally recognized capacitance method, which assesses changes in skin capacitance to determine if stratum corneum water content has increased; a higher measured value indicates higher stratum corneum water content. The TEWL value reflects the integrity of the skin barrier function; a lower TEWL value indicates reduced transepidermal water loss and superior skin barrier function. A lower hemoglobin EI value indicates a lower hemoglobin content. The sample is considered to possess repair efficacy if, following application, the TEWL value decreases significantly and stratum corneum water content increases significantly, or if the hemoglobin EI value decreases significantly.
This test establishes an *in vitro* protocol to evaluate the moisturizing efficacy of cosmetics and raw materials by measuring their water-retention performance in a dry environment.
*In Vitro* Moisturizing Efficacy Evaluation: Three replicates were set up for each test group. Negative and positive control groups were included alongside the test groups; glycerin was used for the positive control, and purified water for the negative control. The procedure for the controls was identical to that for the test samples: A clean, dry, stoppered glass weighing bottle was placed in a desiccator (containing indicating silica gel desiccant) at 25°C ± 1°C for 24 hours prior to the test, and its weight (m0) was accurately recorded. At room temperature, 1 mL of nutrient agar was dispensed into the weighing bottle; after the agar solidified, 200 μL of the test sample was added, and the total mass (m1) was accurately recorded. The bottles were then placed in a desiccator containing desiccant for a total duration of t = 8 hours. For both the sample and control groups, the weighing bottles were removed from the desiccator at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours; the stoppers were secured, and the weight (mt) was accurately recorded.
Moisturizing performance was evaluated based on the percentage of weight loss due to drying.
Test Conclusion: Under the specified test conditions, the results showed that the percentage of weight loss for the sample group at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours was lower than that of the negative control group, indicating that the sample possesses moisturizing efficacy.
Molecular
HIGH-PERFORMANCE SKINCARE SOLUTIONS
Powered by recombinant human Type III collagen, we provide professional skincare solutions for skin repair, barrier care, anti-aging and customized OEM/ODM development.
News